Charles Todd’s debut book A Test of Wills (1996) is an unusual
well-written mystery novel.
It’s 1919 and Inspector Ian Rutledge
returns from the Front to take up his job in Scotland Yard. His fiancée Jean walked
away from him while he convalesced in a clinic. However, the trench warfare has
left an indelible mark on his mind, though there are no outward signs of
shell-shock. ‘he’d discovered din the trenches of France that hell itself was
not half so frightening as the darkest corners of the human mind’ (p167).
[The cover is excellent - those hands holding the sufferer's head resembling the flames of conflict.]
Rutledge hopes that getting back into the
work groove will finally heal him. Hamish is not so sure. Hamish is a Scot,
killed in the war, and now Rutledge’s pestering conscience. ‘He’d seen his
return mainly as the answer to his desperate need to stay busy, to shut out Hamish,
to shut out Jean, to shut out, indeed, the shambles of his life’ (p64). ‘Nightmares strip the soul’ he is told. Rutledge
found no answers for that’ (p124).
It begins with the murder of Colonel Harris
by person or persons unknown in a Warwickshire village. The main suspect is Captain
Wilton, VC. But there are other likely candidates, too: Lettice Wood is the
ward of the late Colonel and the fiancée of Wilton; Mrs Davenant, previously in
love with Wilton; Catherine Tarrant, a famous painter cursed by scandal; Reverend
Carfield, who lusts after Miss Wood; Royston, who looks after Mallows, the Colonel’s
home; Mavers, an unpleasant individual who has always plagued the Colonel; and Hickam,
a village drunk who suffers from shell-shock and nightmares.
Rutledge felt he had to understand the
murdered man, no easy task; at one time, before the war, he’d found it much
easier. ‘How do you put your finger on the pulse of a dead man and bring him to
life?’ (p63).
About halfway through Rutledge experiences
a flashback to the trenches and in a mere three pages Todd conveys the terror
and futility of trench warfare – very telling scenes that explain a great deal,
including the voice of Hamish.
There are many instances of fine writing
and description. When viewing Catherine Tarrant’s paintings, for example: ‘If
you wanted to capture the waste of war, what better expression was there than
this, the very antithesis of the dashing recruitment posters? A girl in a rose-splashed gown whirling
in ecstasy under the spreading limbs of
an aged oak. The lost world of 1914, the innocence and brightness and
abandonment to joy that was gone forever’ (p119).
A bird began to sing in the trees beyond an
open window of the Inquest room. ‘The sound was sweet, liquid, but oddly out of
place as a background to a quiet discussion of death’ (p172).
The doctor’s housekeeper observes about Hickam:
‘… that man suffered. Whatever he did in the war, good or evil, he’s paid for
it every hour since’ (p139).
The book’s title doubtless stems from this
passage: ‘She looked up at him, eyes defensive but resolute. It was a strange
test of wills, and he wasn’t sure exactly where it was leading…’ (p226).
The denouement is well done, shifting the
book into psychological mystery territory.
At present there are twenty-two Inspector Rutledge
books available, which is no mean feat for any author!
Editorial
comment
My bête noir is this: ‘he thought to
himself’ – (p89). He thought would suffice. ‘Himself’ is tautology.
Charles Todd is American and on the whole has
successfully captured the English nuances. The text contains US English
spelling. Many, many years ago a family friend used to work for Penguin books in
London and her task was to Anglicise American spelling in books written by
their US authors. I suspect this is no longer considered necessary or even
viable. For interest, here are a few Americanisms I detected:
‘You’d better come, they’re about to lynch
that stupid devil Mavers!’ – In England we’d say ‘hang’ not ‘lynch’.
‘He just lays there…’ (p138) – In England
we’d say ‘he just lies there…’
‘… questions had gotten him nowhere. (p189)
– In England we’d say ‘questions got him nowhere…’
American English uses ‘toward’ while UK English
uses ‘towards’.
And, inevitably, Rutledge walks along a
sidewalk instead of a path or pavement. (‘Pavement’ in US English is the road).
Separated by a common language, indeed.