The other day we came across Tyndale in two separate quizzes on TV (unrelated to Wolf Hall), followed later by a news report located in Tyndale Street. Of all the names, for that one to crop up three times in one night, it’s most strange… or not.
Truth
is stranger than fiction, they say, and that’s often a fact. Some beginner
writers will include events gleaned from their life, and though quite fantastic
or hinging on remarkable coincidence, they’ll insist it’s true, it happened.
That’s
the problem. In fiction, you can’t get away with slavishly writing down true
coincidences. To the reader, they seem contrived. “You weren’t there!” the
writer will riposte. Quite, but the fiction has to appear true – without stretching the bounds of believability in the
reader’s mind.
Of
course there are plenty of instances where books have been published that
feature hard-to-credit coincidences. But they were published in the past.
Modern readers are perhaps less forgiving, more critical when encountering
these coincidences. Tarzan kept tripping over lost cities in Africa – the continent
was clearly littered with them (as it is, in fact) but by the twentieth novel
they began to stretch credibility. (Okay, a babe adopted by a female great ape
isn’t too credible, either; but that’s the fiction, the suspension of disbelief
working, but hopefully you get my point?)
There’s
nothing wrong in using a coincidence in your novel – but I’d recommend that
this gimmick is used sparingly, as with all similar contrivances. In my
crime fighting nun novel, Sister Rose evades being shot when a bullet intended for her
ricochets off a ski she’s holding (honest!) – so, I used the word, ‘miraculously’
– since she was a nun, I thought she could be allowed one miracle; but only
one.
* * *
Amazon UK here
Amazon COM here
2 comments:
Funny what you can or can't get away with in fiction.
It all depends on the writer - and the reader, I guess, Ron!
Post a Comment