I reviewed this way back when it was first
published, but I think my comments still stand up.
Manipulation of the viewer or reader can annoy; the
scene in Alien where Ripley stripped to her underwear, besides seeming
unnecessary for the story, was to my mind deliberately manipulative, offering
her up visibly defenceless, without even the dubious protection of clothes, and
of course the scene was there for titillation, perhaps. Aliens does it, too,
manipulating, that is: not only is Ripley destined to face the aliens, but she
is to be accompanied by a child – a sure-fire heart-stopper. Despite these
misgivings, the manipulation is effective, as it was in the forerunner, Alien.
This sequel picks up Ripley in suspension floating
in her drifter, Narcissus, some 57 years after she rid herself of the alien.
The character of Ripley is enlarged upon, and her susceptibility to nightmares
is both understandable and well conveyed – in the event she undertakes to
return to the alien planet of her nightmares in order to exorcise them. The
planet now has a name, Acheron, and a colony, which inevitably succumbs to the
aliens! So the space marines are sent in, with state-of-the-art weaponry which
is convincingly featured.
Drawings that accompanied my original review.
‘Both wore the expression of men for whom sleep is a
teasing mistress rarely visited.’
There are minor irritations, such as ‘politicoporate
manoeuvering’, repeated use of ‘heretofore’ outside of legalise contexts, ‘she
was slipping on her equipment’ for ‘she was putting on her equipment’, a
different image entirely, death is an ‘irritating finality’ – irritating seems
an inappropriate description. But these are trifling quibbles concerning a good
edge-of-seat read which kept me awake into the early hours. Reviewers of the
film say they felt drained and limp after the movie, due to unremitting
tension, and the book does read like that too. Yes, it is very well done.
No comments:
Post a Comment