I’m
always going on about POV when I edit someone’s book – some more than others,
let it be said. And I
say as much in a chapter on POV in Write a Western in 30 Days:
‘…character POV is a very important subject for writers of any genre fiction.
I’m specifying genre fiction here: literary fiction gets away with switching
POV at the drop of a thought.’ (p56)
“I’m a strong believer in
telling stories through a limited but very tight third person point of view. I
have used other techniques during my career, like the first person or the
omniscient view point, but I actually hate the omniscient viewpoint. None of us
have an omniscient viewpoint; we are alone in the universe. We hear what we can
hear… we are very limited. If a plane crashes behind you I would see it but you
wouldn’t. That’s the way we perceive the world and I want to put my readers in
the head of my characters.”
2 comments:
This is a complex subject. Head hopping, as you say, is a mark of amateur or lazy writing, though one could argue that it's cinematic. In time it could become the norm, just as classic scene editing has become a thing of the past. Narrators of fiction written 100+ years ago played with POV in ways we don't see today.
Thanks for commenting, Ron. Yes, I'm reading EM Forster's Where Angels Fear to Tread and it's omniscient POV and it works, but I don't get as close to the characters because of that. His humour and phrasing save the book, I suspect... Head hopping has its place perhaps, so long as it's controlled.
Post a Comment