It
has been reported that the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), part of
the WHO, states that consumption of processed red meat, and cured meat, is in
the same carcinogenic category as asbestos, alcohol, arsenic and tobacco. If
you read their statements they include weasel words such as ‘could cause’ and
‘may cause’ and ‘probably linked to’…
A professor
said, ‘Cancer Research UK supports IARC’s decision that there’s strong enough
evidence to classify processed meat as a cause of cancer, and red meat as a
probable cause of cancer.’ And then goes on, ‘We’ve known for some time about
the probable link between red and processed meat and bowel cancer, which is
backed by substantial evidence…’ There’s a strong belief that there’s a ‘causal
link’ to bowel cancer, and possibly prostate cancer.
Bottom line - eat sensibly, and maintain a balanced diet. Common sense says don't eat burgers every day, perhaps...? One wonders if there was an epidemic of colon cancer forty years ago when almost everybody ate a cooked breakfast, including bacon, every day...
As usual,
it’s the headlines that do the scaremongering. There are too many cases of
bowel cancer – one is too many if you’re a sufferer – but this scaremongering
isn’t sensible. Apparently, the IARC has looked at over 900 substances since
1971 and decided that all, apart from one, is at least capable of causing
cancer in certain circumstances. That single exception? A chemical in yoga
pants…
The
IARC does not compare the level of cancer risk associated with different
substances in a given category, so it does not suggest eating meat is as
dangerous as smoking, though they’re in the same category! Either the IARC is
not fit for purpose or the number of defined categories is too narrow. As it
stands, their report seems unhelpful. Still, it keeps them in work – to bring
home the bacon.
Note:
Baloney means ‘nonsense’ and is derived from Bologna; in the US it is another
term for Bologna sausage, which may be processed meat.
This isn’t the
first scare and won’t be the last. In my book Catacomb (just published!) I refer to another
similar instance relating to talcum powder, which is still inconclusive and ongoing
while lining the pockets of lawyers:
Cat was glad she’d chosen this perch. She’d be
no match for any of them, she felt sure, Taekwondo training or no. Training was
one thing, while a life-and-death situation was quite another. She peered down...
As
the sound of the retreating carts and men diminished, Pointer said, “You’ve got
a good racket going here, Zabala. Looting these tombs and selling the finds to private
collectors, probably to the highest bidder. Is that it?”
“Something
like that.” Zabala gestured at the nearest catacomb. “This was a surprise find,
actually, a horde of Moulay Ismail’s possessions from the seventeenth century.”
“Luck,
was it?” Basset asked.
“Yes,
in a way. A few months ago, Maclean, our surveyor, was looking for talc…”
“The
local chemist has plenty,” Basset retorted, “even after that ovarian cancer
scare.”
Cat remembered that. She’d studied it. Yet
another instance of scare-mongering with inadequate data and a total lack of
common sense: volume of talc sales compared to the incidence of ovarian cancer?
Before 1973, talc might have contained minute traces of asbestos. Talc miners
were tested for lung cancer. For years lawyers have plagued cosmetic firms with
lawsuits, fighting on behalf of unfortunate sufferers, but no case has been
proven conclusively. Apparently, studies in rats showed lung damage caused by
talc; which wasn’t surprising since they were forced to inhale talc for six
hours per day for six years; she recalled the critics of the tests called it
“particle overload”. Poor bloody rats. Manufacturers ensure the relatively
large, non-respirable particle size in talc powder so it can’t be inhaled into
lungs. These
scare stories run and run, and at one point talc was even taken off some
shelves, yet there was no significant statistical proof. She hated it when the
science was bad science and had more to do with hubris, greedy lawyers,
inadequate statistics or commercial competition than saving lives.
Zabala
scowled. “For someone whose life is in jeopardy, you’re too flippant, Sergeant.”
“That’s
me,” Basset said, shrugging, as if she hadn’t a care in the world. “Sorry I
interrupted. You were telling us about your surveyor looking for talc
deposits?”
“I
was. He found a large deposit of talc, several thousands of metric tons; its
seam is about fifty percent talc, fifty percent calcite. Nowhere near as big as
the Nkob deposit west of Ouarzazate. Still, Cerberus has planning permission to
mine the talc. Naturally, the Moroccan government gets its cut. Maclean is back
in London with his report and all the boring paperwork.”
“But
instead,” Pointer interjected, “he found these tombs?”
“No.
He left behind a couple of men to begin experimental drilling. Got the shock of
their lives when one of them fell through here.” He pointed up at the small
hole visible in the cave gallery ceiling. “Sadly, he didn’t survive the fall.
His associate contacted HQ and I scooted here to have a look – and conceal the
unfortunate death.”
“I suspect you’re quite good at
that,” Pointer said.
BARNES
& NOBLE books:
SMASHWORDS
books:
KOBO books:
AMAZON
COM books:
AMAZON
UK books:
1 comment:
I'm for bacon! :) Yes, if you ask me, their latest announcement is a bunch of baloney.
Post a Comment