Yesterday, we watched one session that concerned ‘100 books
for children to read by age 14’, a list provided by the Book Trust. We, among
many others, were surprised at the books that were excluded. Books such as Alice in Wonderland, Treasure Island, Wind
in the Willows, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and The Gruffalo.
I’ve since had a look at the Book Trust website, which
can explain some of the exclusions.
The initial selection was for books published in the last
hundred years – so that immediately excludes a great number of classics.
As for the absence of Charlie
and Gruffalo, the 100 selection was
further broken down into the ‘best books’ for 0-5 year-olds; 6-8; 9-11; and 12-14;
so inevitably, that limits each group to only 25 titles. The authors of both of these books are
represented in the list, however, with other titles.
If
nothing else, it proves that whenever a list of ‘best’ books is published, it
will be controversial or at least contentious. And that can be no bad thing – it
encourages discussion about favourite books.
Here
is a selection of children’s classics that couldn’t make it onto that list but still
provide rewarding reading for children:
(Full title not always shown, but you
recognise the book!)
Robinson
Crusoe, 1719
Brothers Grimm, 1812
Swiss Family Robinson, 1813
Hans Christian Andersen tales, 1837-72
Children of the New Forest, 1847
Tom Brown’s Schooldays, 1857
Coral Island, 1858
Water Babies, 1863
Journey to the Centre of the Earth, 1864
Alice in Wonderland, 1865
Little Women, 1868
What
Katy Did, 1873
Tom
Sawyer, 1876Black Beauty, 1877
Treasure
Island, 1883
Pinocchio,
1883Heidi, 1884
King Solomon’s Mines, 1885
Dr Jekyll etc, 1886
Jungle
Book, 1894
Dracula,
1897Moonfleet, 1898
Wizard
of Oz, 1900
Tales
of Peter Rabbit, 1902Call of the Wild, 1903
A Little Princess, 1905
Railway Children, 1906
Wind in the Willows, 1908
Anne of Green Gables, 1908
Secret Garden, 1909
2 comments:
Lists are always interesting. I loved Call of the Wild and Tom Sawyer, two books that almost made it. A few others I remember reading made the list. Fun stuff, nice post.
Thanks, Neil. I missed off The Lost World in the 'missed list' - published in 1912, just under the wire, as it were...
Post a Comment