Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Goldfinger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Goldfinger. Show all posts

Friday, 16 October 2015

Book Review – Trigger Mortis

Of all the recent incarnations, Anthony Horowitz’ take on James Bond, Trigger Mortis (2015) is the closest to the original Fleming novels, in style, content and delivery.

Even if you only have a passing interest in the Bond canon, publicity should have alerted you to the fact that Horowitz has set the story in 1957, a couple of weeks after Goldfinger, and at the beginning of the book he’s entertaining Pussy Galore in his London flat. Then he gets the summons from M – the Soviets are intent on sabotaging the British contender in a Grand Prix motor race in Germany. In the process of countering this threat, Bond stumbles upon an intriguing connection between Soviet general Gaspanov and a Korean millionaire, Sin Jai-Seong. That association sets alarm bells ringing and he decides to investigate.

All of the trademark ingredients are assembled – seamlessly: Sin, an unprepossessing villain, Jeopardy Lane, an ‘ugly-pretty’ female, an enemy lair to infiltrate, hairs-breadth escapes, the following of slim clues to the puzzle, the inevitable capture, a lengthy exposition by the villain, the fiendish choice of death allotted to Bond, and the ‘ticking-bomb’ final act.

Horowitz wanted to reference the earlier books rather than the films, obviously, and succeeds, even to the point of having his characters provide unbroken speech for a page or more, in the manner of Fleming. The settings are perhaps not as exotic, but hold the interest nevertheless: the Grand Prix racetrack, the American rocket launch site, and the subway system of New York.

Both in tone and manner, Bond seems right. I’d be intrigued to know what was excised from the early drafts, however. In one interview Horowitz says that his wife (Jill Green, producer of Foyle’s War) suggested considerable rewriting. She felt that some of the sexism in the book was ‘a little too extreme’. These days there must be a danger of writing a politically correct Bond, which honestly would emasculate the character. I think Horowitz trod this line carefully and pulls it off for his late 1950s characters.

Initially, it seems highly implausible, the idea that Bond – a secret agent with a licence to kill – would be given the mission to learn how to drive a racing car in preparation for a prestigious event, and use that car to thwart the Soviet driver’s murderous plans. (Who said Bond stories had to be plausible, anyway?) Surely, all Bond had to do was accidentally trip the fellow on the stairs, break a leg or two – or if the Soviet racer was a really bad egg, kill him? However, as the 400-500 words of original Fleming text that triggered the storyline (‘Murder on Wheels’) [no pun intended] was about Bond and ‘top-class motor racing’, Horowitz must have felt compelled to wear that particular strait-jacket for this outing. Once the race is over, he gives free rein to his imagination and the pace quickens considerably. And indeed some of Fleming’s Bond adventures began with very little real spying, yet 007’s inquisitive mind often latched onto something sinister that led to adventure, travel, sex and near-death experiences.

The references to earlier Bond adventures – Dr No and Moonraker – are subtle, not even being named but alluded to at appropriate moments.

There are three so-called Bond girls: Pussy Galore, Logan Fairfax, and Jeopardy Lane, and all of them are strong women, capable of looking after themselves. Logan is Bond’s instructor at the English racetrack prior to him going to Germany. Jeopardy’s back-story was interesting (delivered in a page of uninterrupted speech) and she had the potential to go further in another adventure.

A handful of reviewers have criticised Horowitz regarding some inaccuracies. And that’s despite the time and effort he clearly spent in research. (Oh, writing is a thankless task, writing make-believe to appear ‘real’ and being castigated when it isn’t quite real enough!) No matter how strenuous the research, we get things ‘wrong’ somewhere along the line. Having said that, as a reader I rarely let a few minor hiccups blight the story for me – and even if I spotted at least one flaw, it didn’t spoil this fast-paced adventure.

There is a reason for the pun-style title, too. The ending of Trigger Mortis is excellent, by the way. I – and doubtless many other readers – would be pleased to read another Bond adventure from Anthony Horowitz.

The flaw
Despite being a respected journalist, Fleming didn’t always concern himself with accuracy (ask ‘Major’ Geoffrey Boothroyd about that!) so it comes as no surprise that he was using the Soviet organ of assassination SMERSH in his Bond novels up to 1957, although in 1946 it was absorbed into the MGB, the forerunner of the KGB. At that point, Department V of the First Directorate of the KGB took upon itself the assassination role. Perhaps Department V didn’t sound as sinister as ‘Death to Spies’?

Tuesday, 29 October 2013

How could I be so low? - Solo-2

Interesting. I’ve been taken to task regarding a part of my review of Solo:

The first part is uneventful and is unlikely to hook modern-day thriller readers. The tone and style are leisurely, like some of the Bond works, but they held the attention, this barely does that. Apart from a bloody dream/risen memory of D-Day events in France, Bond is not involved in any action. He meets an attractive woman and inadvertently becomes a voyeur. Boyd’s writing a novel, it would seem, not a thriller. I’ve read Boyd’s books and they’re good. This is a disappointment, in contrast.
Everyone’s entitled to their opinion, and not everyone is bound to agree with everyone else; reading – and writing – are inevitably subjective. Still, reviewing what I wrote, it seemed fair comment on my part. To paraphrase, the writer says that I was mistaken when stating ‘the first part is uneventful’, since there was 'heaps happening', adding that this section was setting up the story and Bond books shouldn’t be confused with the pyrotechnics of the cinema version. If I seem to yearn for the all-action scenes of the films, I fail to see where I do so in this review…

In truth, by showing the dream/flashback Boyd was attempting to provide a little background to his Bond, but it didn’t ring true. There was no event in the story to trigger the memory of so long ago. Yes, it was the first time he faced almost certain death. But he’d confronted death so many times since, that particular instance would pale into insignificance. There was no conflict, suspense, genuine intrigue or tension in the present (1969). Story without conflict of some kind is no story.
In Solo, Boyd finally links Bond to M in the third chapter (p32).

A hasty glance at Fleming’s books can be instructive.

Casino Royale (1953) begins with the mission already in flow, the intrigue spelled out, and we’re privy to spycraft techniques. M shows up in Chapter 2 (p14).
Live and Let Die (1954) thrusts Bond straight into a combined mission with the Americans against a certain Mr Big. The interview with M is in Chapter 2 (p11).

Moonraker (1955) does begin with a slight yet highly interesting departure from the previous two books. We glean more insight into the spy’s tradecraft and daily office routine, and there is no actual conflict, though a measure of intrigue. M is introduced in Chapter 2 (p12).
Diamonds are Forever (1956) begins not with Bond but the diamond smugglers, the death of a scorpion and intrigue. Bond and M are introduced in Chapter 2 (p12).

From Russia with Love (1957) again departs from the formula. The first part – some 70 pages – doesn’t actually feature Bond, though he is mentioned. Instead, we meet Red Grant in Chapter 1; it’s tension, character conflict, intrigue all the way, however, for the entire part. (A pedantic aside. Fleming gets it right. The book is separated in parts, but the chapter numbers continue throughout, from 1 through to 28. Boyd gets it wrong. He breaks up Solo into parts but begins each part with Chapter 1. If he had broken up Solo into Books, then yes, the chapters could begin with 1 for each ‘book’.) Bond finally meets M in Chapter 12 (p84).
Dr. No (1958) is back to the old routine and begins with the death of Strangways in Jamaica. In Chapter 2 (p12) M confronts Bond about his near fatal confrontation with Rosa Klebb in the previous assignment. (Boyd makes no mention of Bond’s previous assignments, ostensibly in You Only Live Twice). Then Bond is sent off to Jamaica on a ‘personnel problem’.

Goldfinger (1959) sees Bond again thrust into action straight away, combatting a drug smuggling Mexican and settling a score. We learn about Goldfinger in Chapter 2 (p20) and finally get to see M in Chapter 5 (p40).
Thunderball (1961) begins with just over six pages with M telling Bond he needs a rest at a health resort, Shrublands; conflict over his health. Intrigue about another attendee Count Lippe is raised in Chapter 2 and in the next chapter Bond is almost torn apart on the rack, thanks to Count Lippe… (p31).

On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (1963) again starts with threat and intrigue – Bond and his girl Tracy being abducted by armed men on the beach of Royale-les-Eaux. (Incidentally, here Fleming lets Bond visit the grave of Vesper Lynd from Casino Royale). While M doesn’t appear till p71, he is in Bond’s and our minds as 007 writes a letter of resignation, feeling he’s wasting his time hunting Blofeld and SPECTRE (Chapter 2, p17); again, there’s a reference to the preceding adventure).  
You Only Live Twice (1964) begins with Bond being entertained by Tiger Tanaka, head of the Japanese Secret Service and the chapter ends with Tiger warning Bond that the information he is about to glean is deadly serious. Then it’s a flashback to two months before, with Bond liable to get the sack as a result of the terrible trauma of the last episode, though M is inveigled by the service doctor to give Bond one last mission, in Japan (Chapter 3, p28).

As can be seen, for all the novels there is a formula that is hardly ever greatly altered: conflict either direct or implied, with M interviewing Bond early on. The biggest departure is in From Russia With Love, but there’s a good measure of intrigue and the promise of conflict to keep the pages turning. The rest tend to create conflict of one kind or another for Bond – not non-threatening flashbacks. The conflict can be physical, from criminals or villains, or psychological, due to his stress and health. In Solo, there is a plot reason for Bond getting involved with Bryce Fitzjohn, though it’s rather outlandish; but having him break into her empty house on the pretext given is very contrived. And that is the only actual event in the first Part (up to p30), if you discount Bond’s displeasure with the painters and decorators of his Chelsea home. [Throughout this and my earlier review I have been at pains not to provide any spoilers. This is my opinion, after all, and I have no wish to spoil another's reader enjoyment].
Solo, Chapter 2 (really the fourth chapter, p42) is titled ‘Homework’. Sadly, while I feel that Boyd did some homework on Bond, he didn’t do enough. And I see no reason to alter my review.